JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)August 10, 1995

T-361 de 1995

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓Claimant Manuel Ramon Fernandez Diaz

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. De Peticion. Retiro Del Empleo. Medio De Defensa Judicial. Diferencia Entre Rechazo Y Negacion De La Tutela. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

4 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. REVOCAR la sentencia de fecha 17 de marzo de 1995 proferida por la Seccion Cuarta de la Sala de lo Contencioso Administrativo del H. Consejo de Estado y en su lugar CONFIRMAR el fallo de 21 de febrero de 1995 del Tribunal Administrativo del Cesar que resolvio "denegar la accion de tutela reclamada".
  2. SEGUNDO. Para los fines del articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991, por Secretaria General haganse las comunicaciones a que haya lugar.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.