JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)August 9, 1995

T-359 de 1995

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Hernando Herrera Vergara

✓Claimant Teresa De Jesus Ballesta

✓
Topic · hard data
Pago De Cesantias Definitivas. Prima De Vacaciones. Efectividad De Ders. Laborales. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

4 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. PRIMERO. REVOCAR por las razones expuestas en la parte motiva de esta providencia, la sentencia proferida por el Juzgado
  2. Cuarto. Civil Municipal de Santa Marta el 11 de mayo de 1995, y en su lugar DENEGAR la tutela limpetrada.
  3. SEGUNDO. ORDENAR al Juzgado
  4. Cuarto. Civil Municipal de Santa Marta que compulse copias del expediente a la Procuraduria General de la Nacion, a fin de que, si lo considera pertinente, inicie la investigacion a que haya lugar, en relacion con el incumplimiento del efecto inmediato de la sentencia de dicho Juzgado, de fecha 11 de mayo de 1995, asi como de las diligencias judiciales correspondientes de que trata la parte motiva de la presente sentencia.
  5. TERCERO. LIBRENSE por Secretaria las comunicaciones de que trata el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los efectos alli contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.