JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)August 1, 1994

T-344 de 1994

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero

✓Claimant Hector Hernando Rivera

✓
Topic · hard data
Sueldo De Alcaldes. Proteccion Al Salario. Pago Oportuno. Der. Al Trabajo. Alcalde De Nechi. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

4 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (7 points)
  1. PRIMERO. Confirmase el numeral
  2. primero. de la sentencia de 25 de marzo de 1994 proferida por el Juzgado Penal del Circuito de Caucasia, en cuanto tutelo el derecho al trabajo en condiciones dignas y justas.
  3. SEGUNDO. Revocanse los numerales
  4. segundo. y
  5. tercero. de la misma sentencia, y en su lugar se dispone que la autoridad administrativa del Municipio de Nechi ordene el pago de los sueldos del alcalde Hector Hernando Rivera Ramirez, correspondientes a 1994, y prevenir a la Contraloria General de Antioquia para que no obstaculice tal ordenacion en forma previa puesto que el control es posterior a la ejecucion.
  6. TERCERO. Comuniquese al Juzgado Penal del Circuito Caucasia, al alcalde de Nechi Hector Hernando Rivera Ramirez, al Tesorero de dicho Municipio, al Contralor General de antioquia, al Coordinador del Centro Regional de dicha Contraloria en Caucasia y al Defensor del Pueblo.
  7. Comuniquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.