JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)August 9, 1995

T-348 de 1995

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Arango Mejía

✓Claimant Jose Miguel Diaz Gutierrez

✓
Topic · hard data
Debido Proceso. Fiscales Delegados. Preclusion De Investigacion. Negada. Ver Auto 049/95.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

5 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. CONFÍRMASE la sentencia dictada por el Consejo de Estado, Sala de lo Contencioso Administrativo, Sección Cuarta, con fecha mayo doce (12) de mil novecientos noventa y cinco (1995), pero por las razones expuestas en esta providencia.
  2. SEGUNDO. COMUNÍQUESE la presente sentencia al Tribunal Administrativo de Cundinamarca, para que sea notificada a las partes, de conformidad con lo dispuesto en el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.