JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)August 25, 1993

T-340 de 1993

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Carlos Gaviria Díaz

✓Claimant Elizabeth Cespedes Y Otro

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Intimidad. Derecho Al Buen Nombre. Tutela Contra Particulares. Inversiones M.C. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. PRIMERO. REVOCAR la sentencia proferida por el Juzgado once Penal del Circuito de Santafé de Bogotá, D.C., del catorce (14) de abril de mil novecientos noventa y tres (1993), conforme a la parte motiva de esta providencia. En su lugar, TUTELAR el derecho a la intimidad y al buen nombre de Elizabeth Céspedes de Villarraga y Gustavo Villarraga Gutiérrez en contra de la firma de INVERSIONES M.C.
  2. SEGUNDO. PREVENIR a la firma INVERSIONES M.C. para que, bajo el apremio de la sanción legal en lo sucesivo se ABSTENGA de observar conductas que atenten contra los derechos fundamentales de Elizabeth Céspedes de Villarraga y Gustavo Villarraga Gutiérrez en el cobro del crédito a que se ha hecho referencia.
  3. TERCERO. COMUNIQUESE la presente decisión al Juzgado Once Penal del Circuito de Santafé de Bogotá, D.C., para que se notifique a las partes conforme lo dispone el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.