JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)April 15, 2004

T-339 de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Luis Gabriel Riveros Iriarte Vs Gobernacion De Cumdinamarca Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho De Peticion. Respuesta De Fondo. Solicitud Reajuste Pensional. Termino Para Responder. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho De Peticion Ante Gobernacion De Cundinamarca
  • Vulneración por no respuesta pronta y oportuna sobre reajuste pensional
Derecho De Peticion En Materia Pensional
  • Términos para resolver sobre reajuste pensional
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. PRIMERO. REVOCAR la sentencia del Juzgado 16 Laboral del Circuito de Bogotá del 4 de diciembre de 2003 y, en consecuencia, CONCEDER la tutela al derecho de petición de Luis Gabriel Riveros Iriarte.
  2. SEGUNDO. ORDENAR a la Gobernación de Cundinamarca, Unidad Administrativa Especial de Pensiones, que, de no haberlo hecho, dé respuesta a la solicitud presentada el 21 de julio de 2003 por Luis Gabriel Rivero Iriarte, en el término tres (3) días, contados a partir de la notificación de la presente sentencia.
  3. TERCERO. Para los efectos del artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991, el juzgado de origen hará las notificaciones y tomará las medidas conducentes para el cumplimiento de esta sentencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.