JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)July 15, 1997

T-332 de 1997

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓Claimant Ricardo Restrepo Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Controversias De Indole Prestacional. Pago De La Prima Tecnica A Medicos. Medio De Defensa Judicial. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Improcedencia sobre controversias de índole puramente laboral
Medio De Defensa Judicial
  • No devolución pago de lo debido por existencia de buena fe
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (6 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCANSE los fallos proferidos en los asuntos de la referencia por los juzgados
  2. Primero. Promiscuo del Circuito de Corozal (Expediente T-126.507),
  3. Primero. Civil Municipal y
  4. Segundo. Civil del Circuito (Expediente T-126.508), que habían concedido la tutela a los médicos especialistas de los hospitales Regional Nuestra Señora de las Mercedes de Corozal y Regional de Sincelejo.
  5. Segundo. Si, al momento de ser notificada esta Sentencia, ya se hubieren producido los pagos ordenados, no habrá lugar a devolución alguna.
  6. Tercero. DESE aplicación a lo dispuesto en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.