JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)July 13, 1995

T-309 de 1995

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓Claimant Jesus Gabriel Romero Miranda

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. A La Vivienda Digna. Principio De Solidaridad. Demolicion De Vivienda. Anzoategui. Tolima. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCASE la Sentencia proferida por el Tribunal Administrativo del Tolima el 17 de febrero de 1995, mediante la cual se declaró improcedente la acción de tutela instaurada.
  2. Segundo. CONCEDESE la protección judicial que solicita JESUS GABRIEL ROMERO MIRANDA, por la violación de su derecho constitucional a una vivienda digna, con repercusión en amenaza a su vida e integridad personal, por la omisión en que ha incurrido la administración municipal de Anzoátegui.
  3. Tercero. ORDENASE al Alcalde Municipal de Anzoátegui que, en un término no superior a las 48 horas siguientes a la notificación del presente fallo, adopte las medidas administrativas necesarias para que, antes de 20 días hábiles esté reconstruída, en sus aspectos esenciales, la vivienda de JESUS GABRIEL ROMERO MIRANDA.
  4. Cuarto. El Tribunal Administrativo del Tolima verificará el cabal cumplimiento de esta providencia.
  5. Quinto. Súrtase el trámite previsto en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.