JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)March 18, 2005

T-279 de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño

✓Claimant Aleida De Jesús Galvan Lopez Vs. Iss

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Licencia De Maternidad
  • Pago por tutela cuando afecta el mínimo vital de la madre y su hijo
  • Pago por allanamiento a la mora por EPS
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Derecho al minimo vital de afiliada a quien la entidad le niega el reconocimiento de la licencia de maternidad aduciendo la mora del empleador.

Solicita se ordene el pago de la licencia de maternidad.

Procedencia de la accion de tutela para el reconocimiento y pago de la licencia de maternidad.

Por el tiempo transcurrido desde la ocurrencia del parto hasta la presentacion de la tutela no se infiere una grave afectación del minimo vital salud o seguridad social de la accionante y de sus menores hijas.

Negada

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR la sentencia proferida dentro del asunto de la referencia por la Sala Civil - Familia del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Santa Marta, que denegó la acción de tutela.
  2. Segundo. Dar cumplimiento a lo previsto en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.