JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)March 3, 2005

T-198 de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Jhon Fredy Castañeda Castañeda Vs. Servicio Occidental De Salud De Cali

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Hecho superado por atención médica
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Derecho a la salud y la seguridad social de persona portadora de vih afiliada del regimen contributivo que padece toxoplasmosis quien fuera retirado del sistema por multiafiliacion.

Solicita se ordene su reintegro al servicio de salud como afiliado de pleno derecho y se le preste la atención integral en salud que le corresponda.

Hecho superado por la atencio que le esta siendo brindada en materia de salud.

Negada

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. DECLARAR que por haberse presentado un hecho superado y por esta única razón se CONFIRMA el fallo del Juzgado
  2. Décimo. Penal del Circuito de Cali del 15 de septiembre de 2004, en la acción de tutela instaurada por el señor Jhon Fredy Castañeda Castañeda.
  3. SEGUNDO. LÍBRESE por Secretaría las comunicaciones de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los efectos allí contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.