JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)March 3, 2005

T-196 de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Jordan Heriberto Lopez Rodallega Vs. Grupo Interno De Trabajo De Puertos De Colombia

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Sentencia De Tutela Y Precedente Judicial
  • Este debe ser respetado por el carácter objetivo que ésta tiene
Acción De Tutela
  • Hecho superado por pago de mesadas pensionales a estudiante beneficiario
Pension De Sobrevivientes
  • No procede tutela a estudiante beneficiario para que se le pague mesada adicional
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Derecho al minimo vital de beneficiario de sustitución pensional quien fuera retirado de la nomina por no aportar el certificado de estudio.

Solicita se ordene su inclusion en nomina de pensionados.

Hecho superado por la inclusion en nomina del actor.

Negada

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR la Sentencia proferida por el Tribunal Contencioso Administrativo del Valle del Cauca el 17 de septiembre de 2004, únicamente por la existencia de un hecho superado, y, en consecuencia, NEGAR la tutela al derecho fundamental al mínimo vital del señor Jordán Heriberto López Rodallega.
  2. SEGUNDO. LEVANTAR la suspensión de términos que se impuso mediante el Auto del catorce (14) de diciembre de dos mil cuatro (2004), en el proceso de la referencia.
  3. TERCERO. Para los efectos del artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991, el juzgado de origen hará las notificaciones y tomará las medidas conducentes para el cumplimiento de esta sentencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.