JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)May 8, 1996

T-194 de 1996

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Eduardo Cifuentes Muñoz

✓Claimant Alberto Cardona Contreras

✓
Topic · hard data
Debido Proceso. Acciones Policivas. Derecho De Posesion Sobre Inmueble. Concedida Parcialmente. Ver Auto 056/96.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Proceso Policivo
  • Cumplimiento de lo resuelto por superior
Acción De Tutela
  • Procedencia restringida en actuaciones policivas
Accion Policiva
  • Situación posesoria o mera tenencia
Desacato
  • Actuaciones policivas
Lanzamiento Por Ocupacion De Hecho
  • Negación recurso de apelación
7 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. R E S U E L V E :
  2. Primero. No acceder a la declaracion de nulidad solicitada por el senor Alberto Cardona Contreras contra la sentencia No. T-194 de 1996.
  3. Segundo. Contra esta decision no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.