T-1692 de 2000
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Jairo Charry Rivas
✓Claimant Oscar Rivera Vs. Iglesia Bethesda Y Otra
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Utilización de instrumentos técnicos
- Límites
- Reuniones ruidosas
- Comunidad religiosa
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
See the operative part (4 points)
- PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR la sentencia de fecha 29 de mayo de 2000, proferida por el Juzgado Promiscuo Municipal de La Cumbre (Valle), mediante la cual se concedió el amparo de tutela solicitado por el accionante Oscar Rivera.
- SEGUNDO. CONFIRMAR la sentencia de 5 de mayo de 2000, proferida por el Juzgado
- Segundo. Civil Municipal de Agustín Codazzi (Cesar), mediante la cual se concedió el amparo de tutela solicitado por la Personera Municipal de dicho municipio en favor de Patricia Jiménez, Luis Alfredo López y Rubys Olaya Ibañez.
- TERCERO. Por Secretaría, líbrese la comunicación prevista en el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.