JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)February 12, 2001

T-162 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Fabio Morón Díaz

✓Claimant Miriam Diez Ruiz Vs. Planeacion Municipal De Medellin

✓
Topic · hard data
Derechos A La Vida Salud Igualdad Y Seguridad Social De Paciente Con Cancer Nivel Ii. Expedicicion Carne De Vinculacion Al Sisben. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Sisben
  • Focalización del gasto social
  • Naturaleza
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR la Sentencia de fecha 21 de junio del 2000, que nego la accion de tutela incoada por MIRIAM DIEZ RUIZ.
  2. Segundo. ORDENAR al Departamento de Analisis Estadistico de Planeacion Municipal de Medellin, remitir a la Secretaria de Salud del Municipio de Medellin o a la entidad que haga sus veces, la ficha tecnica 139795 de 9 de septiembre de 1996, para que dicha dependencia municipal proceda conforme a sus competencias y atribuciones si la peticionaria Miriam Diez Ruiz, tiene o no derecho a ser beneficiaria del Regimen Subsidiado de Salud que brinda el Municipio de Medellin, de acuerdo con la Constitucion y la ley.
  3. Tercero. Por Secretaria general, librense las comunicaciones previstas en el articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991, para los efectos alli contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.