JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)March 24, 1994

T-161 de 1994

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Eduardo Cifuentes Muñoz

✓Claimant Albis Esther Diaz

✓
Topic · hard data
Deber De Solidaridad Y Colaboracion Voluntaria De Los Padres De Familia Frente Al Colegio De Sus Hijos. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. REVOCAR el fallo proferido por el juez 55 penal del circuito de Santa Fe de Bogota, por las razones expuestas en esta providencia y, en consecuencia, ORDENAR a las directivas del colegio R.R. Adoratrices que suspendan toda exigencia a los padres de familia derivada de la venta de boletas de rifas, de acuerdo con las disposiciones educativas contenidas en el articulo 203 de la ley 115 de 1994.
  2. SEGUNDO. LIBRAR comunicacion al juzgado 55 penal del circuito de Santa Fe de Bogota a efectos de las notificaciones correspondientes.
  3. Notifiquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.