JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)March 27, 1996

T-131A de 1996

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Vladimiro Naranjo Mesa

✓Claimant Argemiro Molano Yaima

✓
Topic · hard data
Competencia De Los Jueces En Materia De Tutela. Legitimacion Para Actuar. Min-Transporte. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Medio De Defensa Judicial
  • Revocación licencia a empresa de transporte
Acción De Tutela
  • Procedencia de presentación por socios
Competencia De Tutela
  • Entidad nacional
Demanda De Tutela
  • Presentación de la misma acción por varios socios
Persona Juridica
  • Protección derechos de asociados
6 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (2 points)
  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR, por las razones expuestas en la parte motiva de esta providencia, el fallo de fecha seis (6) de septiembre de mil novecientos noventa y cinco (1995), proferido por la Corte Suprema de Justicia, Sala de Casación Penal, que revocó el proferido por el Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Santafé de Bogotá, Sala Penal, el veintiséis (26) de julio del mismo año, en primera instancia.
  2. SEGUNDO. ORDENAR que por la Secretaría General de esta Corporación, se comunique esta providencia al Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Santafé de Bogotá, en la forma y para los efectos previstos en el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.