JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)September 25, 2000

T-1291 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓Claimant Bernardo Gamboa Vidal Vs. Hospital Federico Lleras Acosta De Ibague Y El Instituto Nacional De Medicina Legal Y Ciencias Forenses.

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Salud A La Igualdad Y Peticion. Interno De La Penitenciaria "picaleña" Quien Padece Del Sindrome De Guillain Barre. Solicitud De Rehabilitacion. Responsabilidad Del Estado Frente A La Salud De Las Personas Privadas De La Libertad. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

4 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR los fallos proferidos por los juzgados 2 Penal Municipal y 3 Penal del Circuito de Ibagué, mediante los cuales se negó el amparo.
  2. Segundo. PREVENIR al Hospital Federico Lleras Acosta y al Director del Instituto Nacional Penitenciario y Carcelario -INPEC-, para que, en el futuro continúen brindando toda la atención que requiera el paciente, con el fin de que su salud no se deteriore ni se menoscabe su dignidad humana.
  3. Tercero. DAR cumplimiento a lo previsto en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.