JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)December 3, 2001

T-1286 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Jose Roberto Reyes Cleves Vs. Cooperativa Financiera Para La Amazonia -Cofinam.·Respondent Sin Información

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Libre Asociacion. Solicitud Devolucion De Aportes Por Retiro De Cooperativa. Libertad De Asociacion Negativa. Hipotesis Facticas Minimas Para El Reconocimiento A La Devolucion De Aportes A Las Cooperativas Financieras. Concedida Parcialmente.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Cooperativa
  • Problemas económicos
  • Desafiliación y reintegro de aportes
  • El juez no puede establecer plazo para devolución del remanente de los aportes
1 topic · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR PARCIALMENTE la sentencia del quince (15) de mayo de dos mil uno (2001), proferida por el Juzgado
  2. Tercero. Civil Municipal de Florencia (Caqueta), al resolver la accion de tutela instaurada por instaurada por JOSE ROBERTO CLEVES contra la Cooperativa Financiera para la Amazonia - COFINAM -.
  3. Segundo. MODIFICAR la sentencia mencionada en el numeral anterior, en el sentido de revocar la decision de ordenar a la entidad demandada que reintegre al demandante el excedente de sus aportes a la Cooperativa Financiera para la Amazonia en el termino maximo de seis (6) meses contados a partir de la fecha de comunicacion de la sentencia.
  4. Por Secretaria, librese la comunicacion prevista en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
  5. Notifiquese, comuniquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.