JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)February 10, 2000

T-124 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓Claimant Inocencio Cortes Mendoza

✓
Topic · hard data
Tutela Contra Junta De Calificacion De Invalidez. Pago De Honorarios Corresponde A Fidusalud. Ley 100 De 1993. Art 42. Omision Legitima Del Demandado. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Omisión legítima del demandado
Junta De Calificacion De Invalidez
  • A quien corresponde pago de honorarios
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR el fallo del 3 de septiembre de 1999, proferido por la Sala Laboral del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Santa Fe de Bogotá, por medio del cual se negó la protección solicitada.
  2. Segundo. DAR cumplimiento a lo previsto en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.