JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)March 31, 1998

T-121 de 1998

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Arango Mejía

✓Claimant Rafael Dario Pabon

✓
Topic · hard data
Debido Proceso. Der. De Defensa. Juez De Tutela Carece De Competencia Para Pronunciarse Sobre Aspectos Que Debe Decidir El Juez Penal. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Calificacion De Conducta En Investigacion Penal
  • Posibilidad de ampliación de cargos
Derecho De Defensa
  • Comunicación oportuna de existencia de investigación penal
Juez De Tutela
  • Imposibilidad de indicar cómo valorar material probatorio
Medio De Defensa Judicial En Investigacion Penal
  • Convalidación de actuación por no ejercicio oportuno
Derecho A La Presuncion De Inocencia
  • Comunicación oportuna de existencia de investigación
Medidas De Aseguramiento
  • Probable responsabilidad de sindicados
Medio De Defensa Judicial
  • Investigación previa sin participación del inculpado
9 topics · 9 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Por las razones expuestas en esta providencia, CONFÍRMASE la sentencia proferida por la Corte Suprema de Justicia, Sala de Casación Civil y Agraria, del catorce (14) de agosto de mil novecientos noventa y siete (1997).
  2. Segundo. Por Secretaría General, LÍBRENSE las comunicaciones a que se refiere el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.