JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)March 16, 1995

T-119 de 1995

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓Claimant Marcolino Ariza Reyes

✓
Topic · hard data
Habeas Data. Rectificacion De Informacion. Datacredito. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

4 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (6 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR en todas sus partes la Sentencia proferida por la Sala Civil del Tribunal del Distrito Judicial de Santa Fe de Bogotá, D.C., el 13 de octubre de 1994.
  2. Segundo. ORDENAR a "COMPUTEC S.A.-DATACREDITO" que, en un término no superior a las cuarenta y ocho (48) horas siguientes a la notificación de este Fallo, proceda a eliminar cualquier forma de registro en su banco de datos o archivo respecto del peticionario, MARCOLINO ARIZA REYES, C. de C. 19.113.675 de Bogotá.
  3. Tercero. "COMPUTEC S.A.-DACREDITO" informará por escrito al Juez de primera instancia, el
  4. Sexto. Civil del Circuito de Santa Fe de Bogotá, D.C., sobre el exacto e inmediato cumplimiento de lo ordenado en esta providencia.
  5. Cuarto. Por el cumplimiento de esta Sentencia responderá el representante legal de "COMPUTEC S.A.", a quien se advierte que el desacato será sancionado en la forma prevista por el artículo 52 del Decreto 2591 de 1991. Notifíquesele personalmente.
  6. Quinto. LIBRESE la comunicación prevista en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.