JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)December 1, 2003

T-1154 de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Maria Soledad Garcia Londoño Vs. Bancafe Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Derechos Al Buen Nombre Dignidad Y Honra De Persona Reportada A Datacredito Quien Se Encontraba A Paz Y Salvo. Habeas Data. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho Al Habeas Data
  • Expedición de paz y salvo por Bancafé
  • Indebido reporte a bases de datos por error operativo del banco
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCASE por las razones expuestas en la parte motiva de esta sentencia, el fallo proferido por el Juzgado Dieciseis Civil Municipal de Bogota, en julio dieciocho (18) del ano 2003, dentro de la accion de tutela instaurada por la senora Maria Soledad Garcia Londono, en contra de Bancafe, Cifin y Asobancaria. En su lugar, CONCEDASE el amparo solicitado.
  2. Segundo. ORDENASE al Banco Cafetero y a las demas entidades demandadas, que en el termino de cuarenta y ocho (48) horas, contadas a partir de la notificacion de esta providencia, actualicen los datos negativos que con relacion a la obligacion adquirida por la senora Maria Soledad Garcia Londono con "prestafacil" del Banco Cafetero, existan en su base de datos
  3. Por Secretaria General, librense las comunicaciones de que trata el articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.