JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)November 10, 2004

T-1129 de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto

✓Claimant Roque Jacinto Fernández Escobar Vs. Coomeva

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Salud Y La Vida De Afiliado De La Tercera Edad Que Padece Cancer De Próstata Y A Quien La Entidad Le Niega El Suministro De Medicamentos No Pos Formulados Por Medico Tratante. Justificaciones Para Confirmar Un Fallo De Tutela Por Parte De La
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho A La Salud
  • Fundamental por conexidad con la vida digna
  • Suministro de medicamentos excluidos del POS
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. LEVANTAR la suspension de terminos ordenada mediante auto del veintisiete (27) de agosto del ano en curso, en el proceso de la referencia.
  2. Segundo. CONFIRMAR el fallo proferido el veinte (20) de enero de dos mil cuatro (2004), por el Juzgado
  3. Octavo. Penal Municipal de Barranquilla, dentro de la accion de tutela instaurada por el senor ROQUE FERNANDEZ ESCOBAR contra la E.P.S. COOMEVA, por las razones expuestas en la parte motiva de este fallo.
  4. Tercero. Por Secretaria General, librense las comunicaciones de que trata el articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.