JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)August 17, 2000

T-1074 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓Claimant Teofilo Manuel Narvaez Vs. Fondo Pasivo Social De La Empresa Puertos De Colombia.

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho De Petición. Acceso A Documentos Publicos. Concedida-
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR el fallo proferido por el Juzgado
  2. Octavo. Laboral del Circuito de Bogotá del 14 de marzo de 2000. En su lugar, CONCEDER la protección del derecho de petición del señor Teofilo Manuel Narváez Mendoza.
  3. Segundo. ORDENAR al Director de la empresa Fondo de Pasivo Social de Puertos de Colombia, que en el término de cuarenta y ocho (48) horas, contadas a partir de la notificación de ésta sentencia, entregue al señor Teofilo Manuel Narváez Mendoza, las copias de los documentos por él solicitadas dentro de la petición elevada el día 30 de noviembre de 1999 a dicha entidad.
  4. Tercero. El desacato a lo ordenado en esta providencia, se sancionará de conformidad con lo señalado en el artículo 52 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
  5. Cuarto. Por Secretaría líbrese la comunicación de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.