JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)August 17, 2000

T-1071 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Vladimiro Naranjo Mesa

✓Claimant Mauricio Cheyne Bonilla Vs. Juzgado 10 De Familia -Bogota - Y Otro

✓
Topic · hard data
Debido Proceso. Via De Hecho. Solicitud Declaratoria De Nulidad De Dictamen Pericial En Proceso Sucesorio. Autenticidad De Firmas Del Finado Sobre Letras De Cambio. Improcedencia De La Tutela. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela Contra Providencias Judiciales
  • Procedencia excepcional por vía de hecho
Via De Hecho
  • Naturaleza
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. CONFIRMAR integralmente el fallo proferido por la sala de casacion civil y agraria de la corte suprema de justicia, el nueve (9) de febrero de 2000 y, por ende, DENEGAR la tutela solicitud en razon a su improcedencia.
  2. DESDE cumplimiento a lo previsto por el articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.