JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)March 4, 1994

T-095 de 1994

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓Claimant Carlos Granados Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Desalojo De Pescadores Del Terminal Maritimo De Sta Marta. Posesion. Improcedencia De La Tutela Para Obtener Indemnizacion. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

7 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR las sentencias proferidas por el Juzgado
  2. Segundo. Civil de Circuito y el Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Santa Marta -Sala Civil- los días 21 de julio y 26 de agosto de 1993, respectivamente, al resolver sobre la acción de tutela instaurada por Carlos Alfonso Granados Martínez y otros contra la empresa Puertos de Colombia.
  3. Segundo. LIBRESE la comunicación prevista en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 19991
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.