JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)February 6, 2003

T-079 de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Araujo Rentería

✓Claimant Maria Del Socorro Daza Orozco Vs. Iss Cesar

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho De Peticion. Nucleo Esencial. Solicitud Reconocimiento Pension De Jubilacion. Respuesta De Fondo. Seis Meses Para Resolver. Ley 700 De 2001. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho De Peticion
  • Término para resolver reconocimiento y pago de pensiones
  • Alcance
Pension De Jubilacion
  • Término de seis meses para trámite y pago
Derecho De Petición
  • Núcleo esencial
3 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia proferida por el Juzgado
  2. Cuarto. Penal del Circuito de Valledupar al resolver sobre la acción de tutela incoada por María del Socorro Daza Orozco contra el Instituto de Seguros Sociales y en su lugar CONCEDER el amparo solicitado.
  3. Segundo. ORDENAR al Instituto de Seguros Sociales, Seccional Cesar, que si todavía no lo ha hecho, en el término de cuarenta y ocho (48) horas contadas a partir de la notificación de este fallo, responda de fondo la solicitud formulada por la actora, notificándole a ésta sobre lo decidido.
  4. Tercero. Por Secretaría líbrese la comunicación de que trata el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.