JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)February 7, 1997

T-057 de 1997

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Carlos Gaviria Díaz

✓Claimant Carlos Augusto Bernal Mendez

✓
Topic · hard data
Tutela Contra Providencias Judiciales. Inexistencia De Via De Hecho. Prevalencia Del Der. Sustancial. Gaseosas Lux. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Demanda De Tutela
  • Omisión pronunciamiento de fondo
Doctrina Constitucional
  • Vulneración de derechos por desconocimiento
Igualdad Frente A La Administracion De Justicia
  • Inexistencia justificación para apartarse de jurisprudencia
Via De Hecho
  • Agotamiento de mecanismos judiciales alternos
6 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia proferida por la Subseccion A de la Seccion Segunda de la Sala de lo Contencioso Administrativo del Consejo de Estado el 10 de septiembre de 1996; en su lugar, CONFIRMAR el fallo adoptado por la Seccion Primera del Tribunal Administrativo de Cundinamarca el 30 de julio del mismo ano.
  2. Segundo. COMUNICAR este fallo de revision al Tribunal Administrativo de Cundinamarca para los efectos previstos en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
  3. Comuniquese, notifiquese, cumplase e
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.