JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)January 22, 2001

T-042A de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Fabio Morón Díaz

✓Claimant Albino Pantoja Estrada Vs. Cajanal

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A Una Vida Digna Y Seguridad Social De Persona De La Tercera Edad. Suministro Tratamientos Y Medicamentos No Incluidos En El Pos. Protesis Auditiva. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Inaplicacion De Normas Del Plan Obligatorio De Salud
  • Suministro de audífonos a persona de la tercera edad
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. Revocar el fallo proferido por el Juzgado
  2. Primero. Laboral del Circuito de Pasto, que negó el amparo al actor por las razones expuestas en la parte motiva de esta providencia.
  3. Segundo. Conceder la protección de los derechos constitucionales fundamentales del accionante, a tener una vida digna y a la seguridad social y Ordenar al Director de Cajanal E.P.S. Seccional Nariño que, si todavía no lo ha hecho, en el término de las cuarenta y ocho (48) horas siguientes a la notificación de la presente providencia, proceda a suministrar al actor la prótesis requerida para la conservación y preservación de su salud auditiva.
  4. Tercero. Por Secretaría, líbrese la comunicación prevista en el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.