JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)January 24, 2002

T-032 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño

✓Claimant Jose Arley Lopez Obando Vs. Fiscalia 29 Delegada Ante Tribunales Superiores De Bogota Y Otra

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho Al Debido Proceso Y Exoneracion Del Deber De Declarar En Proceso Penal Por El Delito De Injuria. Auto Incriminacion. Compromiso De Confidencialidad. Responsabilidad De Naturaleza Criminal Correccional O De Policia. Nucleo Esencial. Suministro De I
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Principio De No Autoincriminacion
  • No hay vulneración por cuanto el actor es parte civil en el proceso penal
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. No tutelar el derecho al debido proceso y el derecho a la exoneración del deber de declarar del actor José Arley López Obando.
  2. Segundo. Confirmar la sentencia proferida el 28 de junio de 2001 por la Sección Segunda del Tribunal Administrativo de Cundinamarca y la sentencia proferida el 16 de agosto de 2001 por la Sección Segunda de la Sala de lo Contencioso Administrativo del Consejo de Estado.
  3. Tercero. Dése cumplimiento a lo dispuesto en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.