JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)February 18, 1993Full bench

C-052 de 1993

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Sanin Greiffenstein

✓
Topic · hard data
Concesion De Beneficios Por Colaboracion Con La Justicia. Delatores. Conmocion Interior.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Revisión de constitucionalidad del Decreto Legislativo N.º 1833 de 1992 "Por el cual se expiden normas sobre concesión de beneficios por colaboración con la justicia".

La Corte consideró que el decreto estudiado no violó el principio de igualdad contenido en el artículo 13 de la Carta Política, ya que las normas de excepción están destinadas afrontar casos no previstos en la legislación ordinaria.

Por lo anterior, declaró exequible el decreto legislativo revisado.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 1833/92. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

On the entire provisionDecreto 1833/92UPHELD
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. Declarar EXEQUIBLE el Decreto 1833 de 13 de noviembre 1992 "Por el cual se expiden normas sobre concesión de beneficios por colaboración de la justicia".
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available3
DissentAlejandro Martínez CaballeroDissentJosé Gregorio Hernández GalindoDissentCiro Angarita Baron
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.