JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)January 23, 1997

T-018 de 1997

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Arango Mejía

✓Claimant Ligia Marulanda Ochoa

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. A La Sustitucion Pensional. La Actora No Acudio A Los Medios De Defensa Judicial Que Tenia A Su Alcance. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Igualdad De Familias
  • Sustitución de pensión para compañera permanente
Medio De Defensa Judicial
  • Resolución que niega sustitución de pensión
3 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (2 points)
  1. Primero. CONFÍRMASE la sentencia del Juzgado Dieciocho (18) Civil del Circuito de Santafé de Bogotá, Distrito Capital, de fecha treinta (30) de julio de mil novecientos noventa y seis (1996), que denegó la tutela propuesta por la señora Ligia Marulanda Ochoa, pero ORDÉNASE al Ministerio de Defensa dictar la decisión correspondiente a la sustitución de la pensión del señor Alvaro Correa, con citación y audiencia de las señoras Ana Sofía Duque de Correa y Ligia Marulanda Ochoa.
  2. Segundo. COMUNÍQUESE esta providencia al Juzgado Dieciocho (18) Civil del Circuito de Bogotá, para los efectos previstos en el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.