JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)October 3, 2002Full bench

C-810 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño

✓Claimant Jairo Alberto Baquero Prada

✓
Topic · hard data
Cosa Juzgada Constitucional En Vigencia De Ley En Sistema General De Participaciones
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Cosa Juzgada Constitucional
  • Vigencia de ley en sistema general de participaciones
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 715 de 2001.

Distribucion recursos y competencias entre la nacion y entidades territoriales.

Acto legislativo 01 de 2001.

Prestacion servicios de educacion y salud.

Sistema general de participaciones.

Vigencia y derogatorias.

Cosa juzgada constitucional

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 715/01. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 151Ley 715/01ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
On the entire provisionActo_legislativo 1/01ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
2 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. Estarse a lo resuelto en la sentencia C-618 de 2002.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
ConcurrenceJaime Córdoba Triviño
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.