JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)June 29, 2000Full bench

C-798 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Carlos Gaviria Díaz

✓Claimant Fernando Martinez Rojas

✓
Topic · hard data
Fallo Inhibitorio Por Sustracción De Materia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Decreto 1730 de 1991.

Art. 2.1.3.2.16 (p.).

Sancion por no consignar oportunamente el auxilio de cesantia.

Inhibitoria.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 1730/91. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 1Decreto 1730/91DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 2Decreto 1730/91DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 2.1.3.2.16Decreto 1730/91DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 3Decreto 1730/91DECLINED TO RULE
4 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. INHIBIRSE para decidir sobre la constitucionalidad del artículo 2.1.3.2.16 del Decreto 1730 de 1.991, por sustracción de materia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.