JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)May 31, 2000Full bench

C-638 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Vladimiro Naranjo Mesa

✓Claimant Luis Eduardo Martinez Llerena

✓
Topic · hard data
Jurisdiccion Contencioso Administrativa. Indemnización De Perjuicios
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Cumplimiento
  • No es declarativa de derechos
  • Sujeto pasivo
  • No persigue indemnización de perjuicios
  • Objeto
  • Sujeto activo
Libertad De Configuracion Legislativa
  • Trámites para demandar responsabilidad patrimonial del Estado
Jurisdiccion Contencioso Administrativa
  • Indemnización de perjuicios
5 topics · 9 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 393/97.

Art. 24.

Indemnizacion de perjuicios de la accion de cumplimiento.

Exequible.

Inhibitoria.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 393/97. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 24Ley 393/97UPHELD
Art. 24Ley 393/98DECLINED TO RULE
2 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (6 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. R E S U E LV E
  3. Primero. Declarar EXEQUIBLE el inciso
  4. primero. del articulo 24 de la Ley 393 de 1997.
  5. Segundo. Declararse INHIBIDA para proferir un fallo de fondo respecto del inciso
  6. segundo. del articulo 24 de la Ley 393 de 1998.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.