C-480 de 2005
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa
✓Claimant Willman Alexis Gonzalez Marquinez
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Concepto de violación
- Ausencia de concepto de violación no puede ser suplida oficiosamente
- Requisitos mínimos
- Incumplimiento de requisitos de claridad, especificidad y pertinencia en los cargos
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Ley 906 de 2004 articulo 323.
Se expide el codigo de procedimiento penal.
Aplicacion del principio de oportunidad.
Ineptitud sustantiva de la demanda.
Inhibicion de la corte constitucional para proferir decision de fondo.
El demandante no ha cumplido con la carga minima de claridad pertinencia y especificidad en la argumentación que le incumbe en tanto actor dentro de un proceo de control constitucional abstracto.
Inhibida
What it decided
Holdings on Ley 906/04. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
- RESUELVE
- Declararse INHIBIDA para adoptar una decision de merito dentro del proceso de la referencia.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.