JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)June 25, 1992Full bench

C-434 de 1992

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Fabio Morón Díaz

✓Claimant Raimundo Mendoza.

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 60/90 Art. 2 Num 1 Y Dec. 1660/91. Facultades Extraordinarias. Retiro Del Servicio De Empleado Publico. Exequible.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 60/90. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 2Ley 60/90UPHELD
On the entire provisionDecreto 1660/91UPHELD
2 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del Pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. R E S U E L V E:
  3. Es EXEQUIBLE el numeral 1o. del artículo 2o. de la Ley 60 de 1990, desde el punto de vista formal, y por lo tanto no existe inconstitucionalidad consecuencial en relación con el Decreto 1660 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.