C-423 de 2002
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis
✓Claimant Carlos Alberto Bohorquez Yepes
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Presunción existencia de dolo en acción de repetición
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Ley 678 de 2001.
Art. 5 inc. 2 (p.).
Responasabilidad patrimonial de los agentes del estado a traves del ejercicio de la accion de repeticion o de llamamiento en garantia con fines de repeticion.
Aspectos procesales.
Dolo.
Principio de buena fe.
Cosa juzgada constitucional.
Estese a lo resuelto en c-374/02
What it decided
Holdings on Ley 678/01. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- ESTAR A LO RESUELTO en la Sentencia C-374 de 2002 en relacion con la exequibilidad de la expresion "se presume que existe dolo" contenida en el
- segundo. inciso del articulo 5 de la Ley 678 de 2001.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.