JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)September 9, 1993Full bench

C-378 de 1993

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Fabio Morón Díaz

✓Claimant Min. Rels. Exteriores

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 39/93. Convenio De Cooperacion Cultural Y Educativa Con Cuba. Constitucional Salvo Algunas Expresiones.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Tratado Internacional
  • Elaboración
  • Vigencia provisional
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 39/93. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. IVProvision reviewedSTRUCK DOWN· phrase
Phrase struck down«y otros»
Art. XVIProvision reviewedSTRUCK DOWN· phrase
Phrase struck down«entrará provisionalmente en vigor el día de su firma»
On the entire provisionProvision reviewedUPHELD
4 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. en nombre del Pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. Primero. DECLARAR CONSTITUCIONAL el "CONVENIO DE COOPERACION CULTURAL Y EDUCATIVA ENTRE EL GOBIERNO DE LA REPUBLICA DE COLOMBIA Y EL GOBIERNO DE LA REPÚBLICA DE CUBA", firmado en La Habana el 7 de julio de 1978", así como la Ley 39 del 15 de enero de 1993, que lo aprueba; excepción hecha de los segmentos normativos siguientes del Convenio:
  4. 1. La expresión "y otros" del artículo IV; y, 2. La expresión "entrará provisionalmente en vigor el día de su firma" del artículo XVI del Convenio, que se declaran inconstitucionales.
  5. Segundo. Debe el señor Presidente de la República al ratificar el tratado, formular las reservas correspondientes.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.