JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)April 27, 2004Full bench

C-378 de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant Elver Cuellar Murcia

✓
Topic · hard data
Cosa Juzgada Constitucional En Requisitos Para Cargo Directivo De Entidad De Salud De Municipio
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Cosa Juzgada Constitucional
  • Requisitos para cargo directivo de entidad de salud de municipio
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Decreto 1569 de 1998.

Art. 24 num. 3 (p.).

Sistema de nomenclatura y clasificacion de empleos de entidades territoriales reguladas por ley 443 de 1998.

Requisitos para ejercer empleos del nivel ejecutivo en el area de la salud.

Director de hospital.

Estese a lo resuelto en c-100/04

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 1569/98. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 24Decreto 1569/98ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
On the entire provisionLey 443/98ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
2 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. R E S U E L V E:
  3. ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO en la sentencia C-100 de 2004, M.P. Rodrigo Escobar Gil, en relacion con los cargos formulados contra la expresion "en el area de la salud" contenida en el numeral 3o del articulo 24 del Decreto 1569 de 1998.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.