JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)April 20, 2004Full bench

C-352 de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Rodrigo Escobar Gil

✓Claimant Karin Irina Kuthfeldt Salazar

✓
Topic · hard data
Cosa Juzgada Constitucional En Estímulos Al Sufragante
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Cosa Juzgada Constitucional
  • Estímulos al sufragante
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 403 de 1997.

Art. 2 (p.).

Ley 815 de 2003.

Art. 2 num. 6.

Estimulos para sufragantes.

Derecho al voto.

Ejercicio.

Mecanismos de participación.

Formación de buenos ciudadanos.

Descuento valor matricula a estudiantes de pregrado y postgrado en universidad nacional.

Estese a la sentencia c-041/04 y c-224/04

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 403/97. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 2Ley 403/97ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
Art. 2Ley 815/03ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
2 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. R E S U E L V E
  3. PRIMERO. En relacion con las expresiones "y en los eventos relacionados con los demas mecanismos de participacion constitucionalmente autorizados", contenida en el articulo 2deg de la Ley 403 de 1997, y "o eventos de participacion ciudadana directa", que hace parte del numeral 6deg del articulo 2deg de la Ley 815 de 2003, ESTESE A LO RESUELTO en la Sentencia C-041 de 2004, que las declaro INEXEQUIBLES.
  4. SEGUNDO. En relacion con la expresion "buenos", que hace parte del numeral 6deg del articulo 2deg de la Ley 815 de 2003, ESTESE A LO RESUELTO en la Sentencia C-224 de 2004, que declaro inexequible todo el texto del precepto citado.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.