JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)March 8, 2000Full bench

C-270 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Carlos Gaviria Díaz

✓Claimant Hernando Alberto De La Espriella Burgos

✓
Topic · hard data
Contrato De Concesion De Telefonia Movil Celular. Disposición Por Legislador De Manera De Cumplir Sentencia De Constitucionalidad
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Contrato De Concesion De Telefonia Movil Celular
  • Disposición por legislador de manera de cumplir sentencia de constitucionalidad
Corte Constitucional
  • Efectos de los fallos en control constitucional
Control De Constitucionalidad
  • Efectos en el tiempo de fallos
Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Cumplimiento por legislador de sentencia de constitucionalidad respecto a efectos en el tiempo
  • Disposición legal que contraría norma constitucional que regula efecto de sentencia de constitucionalidad
5 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 217 de 1995.

Art 5.

Efectos de las sentencias de la corte constitucional en ejercicio del control de constitucionalidad.

Efectos sentencia en c-423/95 transferencia de recursos de telefonia movil celular.

Exequible.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 217/95. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 5Ley 217/95UPHELD
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. Declarar EXEQUIBLE el aparte demandado del artículo 5 de la Ley 217 de 1995.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.