JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)March 11, 2003Full bench

C-209 de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Araujo Rentería

✓Claimant Alexander Carrillo Cruz

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 522 De 1999. Arts. 234 Y 368. Codigo Penal Militar. Competencia Sala De Casacion Penal De La Corte Suprema De Justicia En Unica Instancia Y Previa Acusacion Del Fiscal General De La Nacion. Cosa Juzgada Absoluta. Estese <a Href=../2001/C-361-01e.Rtf>
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Cosa Juzgada Constitucional
  • Atenuación del carácter absoluto
  • Competencia de la Sala Penal de la Corte Suprema de Justicia
Fuero Penal Militar
  • Interpretación restrictiva
Fuero Legal
  • Asignación de competencias
  • Juzgamiento de fiscales militares
  • Sistema dual
Justicia Penal Ordinaria
  • Delito por miembro de fuerza pública sin relación con el servicio
7 topics · 10 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 522/99. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 234Ley 522/99STRUCK DOWN
Art. 368Ley 522/99STRUCK DOWN
2 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. R E S U E L V E:
  3. PRIMERO. Estar a lo resuelto en la sentencia C-361 2001, por la cual, en relacion con la ley 522 de 1999 se declaro "EXEQUIBLE el numeral 3deg del articulo 234, salvo la expresion "y fiscales ante esa corporacion", que se declara INEXEQUIBLE".
  4. SEGUNDO. INHIBIRSE de fallar de fondo, por las razones expuestas en la parte considerativa de esta sentencia, respecto de la constitucionalidad del inciso 3o del articulo 368 de la ley 522 de 1999.
  5. TERCERO.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.