JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)December 12, 2000Full bench

C-1712 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Cristina Pardo Schlesinger

✓Claimant Roberto Hermida Izquierdo

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 344 De 1996. Art. 16. Parag. Racionalizacion Del Gasto Publico Y Se Conceden Unas Facultades Extraordinarias. Ingresos Correspondientes A Los Aportes Sobre Las Nominas. Directores Del Sena Y Colciencias. Unidad De Materia. Exequible.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Principio De Unidad De Materia
  • Alcance
  • Norma ajena al tema principal
Servicio Nacional De Aprendizaje
  • Director de Colciencias hace parte de Consejo Directivo
  • Director hace parte de Colciencias
  • Objeto institucional
Ley
  • Reducción, racionalización y reasignación de recursos
  • Relación de conexidad con materia
4 topics · 8 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 344/96. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 16Ley 344/96 «parágrafo»UPHELD
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. R E S U E LV E
  3. Declarar EXEQUIBLE el paragrafo del articulo 16 de la Ley 344 de 1996.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJosé Gregorio Hernández Galindo
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.