JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)November 29, 2000Full bench

C-1644 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓Claimant Fabio Alberto Rivera Acevedo

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 529 De 1999. Art. 10 Inc. 2. Modificaciones En El Presupuesto De Rentas Y Recursos De Capital Y Ley De Apropiaciones Para La Vigencia Fiscal De 1999. Destinacion De Recursos. Carencia Actual De Objeto. Inhibida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Inhibicion De La Corte Constitucional
  • Agotamiento de contenido de norma
  • Agotamiento plazo de norma
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 529/99. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 10Ley 529/99DECLINED TO RULE
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Declararse INHIBIDA para fallar de mérito sobre la constitucionalidad del inciso
  2. segundo. del artículo 10 de la Ley 529 de 1999, en atención a que el aparte acusado no surte actualmente ningún efecto, y por tanto, no existe objeto sobre el cual pueda recaer la Sentencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.