JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)February 25, 2003Full bench

C-159 de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Eduardo Montealegre Lynett

✓Claimant Nancy Susana Gomez Quiroz

✓
Topic · hard data
Decreto 1790 De 2000. Arts. 5 (P.) 11 24 25 (P.) 30 31 32 65 (P.) 66 (P.) Y 74. Carrera Del Personal De Oficiales Y Suboficiales De Las Fuerzas Militares. Ejercicio De Facultades Extraordinarias. Cosa Juzgada Constitucional. Abuso Del Derecho De Demandar.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Abuso Del Derecho En Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Investigación disciplinaria
  • Presentación
Cosa Juzgada Constitucional
  • Normas de carrera de oficiales y suboficiales de Fuerzas Militares
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 1790/00. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 11Decreto 1790/00ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
Art. 24Decreto 1790/00ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
Art. 25Decreto 1790/00ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
Art. 30Decreto 1790/00ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
Art. 31Decreto 1790/00ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
Art. 32Decreto 1790/00ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
Art. 5Decreto 1790/00ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
Art. 65Decreto 1790/00ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
Art. 66Decreto 1790/00ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
Art. 74Decreto 1790/00ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
10 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO en la sentencia C-757 de 2002
  2. Segundo. Compulsar copias de esta sentencia a la Sala Disciplinaria del Consejo Superior de la Judicatura.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.