JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)February 22, 2005Full bench

C-152 de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓
Topic · hard data
Control De Constitucionalidad Del Convenio De Cooperacion Turistica Entre El Gobierno De La Republica De Colombia Y El Gobierno De La Republica De Bolivia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

3 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 883 de 2004 que aprueba el convenio de cooperación turística entre el gobierno de la republica de colombia y el gobierno de la republica de bolivia.

Examen de constitucionalidad del convenio y de la ley aprobatoria.

Aspectos formales y tramite legislativo.

Aspectos materiales y contenidos del convenio y de la ley.

Exequibles el convenio y la ley

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 883/04. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Declarar EXEQUIBLE el "CONVENIO DE COOPERACION TURISTICA ENTRE EL GOBIERNO DE LA REPUBLICA DE COLOMBIA Y EL GOBIERNO DE LA REPUBLICA DE BOLIVIA", suscrito en la ciudad de la Paz, a los veinte (20) dias del mes de agosto del anos dos mil uno (2001).
  2. Segundo. Declarar EXEQUIBLE la Ley 883 del 4 de junio de 2004, por medio de la que se aprueba el citado Convenio.
  3. Tercero. Ordenar la comunicacion de la presente sentencia al Presidente de la Republica y a la Ministra de Relaciones Exteriores, para los fines contemplados en el numeral 10 del articulo 241 de la Constitucion Politica.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.