C-108 de 2004
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra
✓Claimant Jaime Hernan Ramirez Gasca
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Tránsito en igualdad de condiciones
- No uso exclusivo de bahías de parqueo para obtención de licencias por entidades y propietarios de locales comerciales
- Uso común en beneficio de toda la colectividad
- Uso y goce
- No es posible invocar derechos adquiridos
- No uso exclusivo para determinado grupo de personas
- Alcance del concepto
- No constituyen derechos adquiridos
- Inalienables, imprescriptibles e inembargables
- Cumplimiento de requisito no significa reconocimiento de derechos sobre espacio de uso público
- Requisito de construcción de bahías de parqueo
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Ley 769 de 2002.
Art. 78 (p.).
Codigo nacional de transito terrestre.
Zonas y horarios de estacionamiento especiales.
Uso exclusivo del espacio publico frente a establecimientos y locales comerciales.
Construccion de bahias para el parqueo de vehiculos.
What it decided
Holdings on Ley 769/02. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Declarar EXEQUIBLE el inciso
- segundo. del articulo 78 de la Ley 769 de 2002 "Por la cual se expide el Codigo Nacional de Transito Terrestre y se dictan otras disposiciones", por los cargos analizados en esta sentencia.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.