JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)December 3, 2002Full bench

C-1069 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Araujo Rentería

✓Claimant Jorge Florez Gacharna

✓
Topic · hard data
Demanda Civil. Integración De Original Y Reforma En Un Solo Escrito
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Demanda Civil
  • Integración de original y reforma en un solo escrito
  • No presentación de reforma debidamente integrada en un solo escrito
  • Reforma
  • Unificación en un solo texto ante reforma
3 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Codigo de procedimiento civil.

Art. 89 num 3 (p.).

Modificado por decreto 2282 de 1989.

Art. 1 num. 40.

Reforma de la demanda.

Presentacion en un solo escrito.

Inadmisibilidad y rechazo.

Potestad configurativa.

Prevalencia del derecho sustancial.

Acceso a la administracion de justicia

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 1400/70. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 89Decreto 1400/70UPHELD
Art. 1Decreto 2282/89UPHELD
2 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. Primero. Declarar EXEQUIBLE la expresion "si no se hiciere, la reforma se tendra por no presentada", contenida en el numeral 3 del articulo 89 del Codigo de Procedimiento Civil, modificado por el articulo 1o, numeral 40, del Decreto-ley 2282 de 1989.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.