A- de 2001
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño
✓Claimant Carlos Guillermo Castro Guevara.
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- No revive término de inadmisión
- No controversia de providencia inadmisoria
- Inadmisión
- Razones por las cuales normas constitucionales se estiman violadas
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Se confirmó el auto del 20 de junio de 2001 en relación con la demanda presentada por el ciudadano de la referencia, toda vez que la decisión de rechazar la demanda en el caso analizado no obedeció a una causa diferente que el silencio del demandante, por lo que no le quedaba opción distinta al Magistrado Sustanciador que proceder a rechazar la demanda, de acuerdo con lo dispuesto en el Decreto 2067 de 1991.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional,
- RESUELVE:
- CONFIRMASE el Auto del 20 de junio de 2001, proferido por el Magistrado Manuel Jose Cepeda Espinosa, en relacion con la demanda presentada por Carlos Guillermo Castro Guevara.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.